over.flow.je /

States of Jersey Electoral Reform Models


Current Model

Constitution:


Representation Data:




Deputies Per District

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 1 5320 44.45% 0.69
St Brelade #1 3690 1 3690 0.19% 1.00
St Brelade #2 7850 2 3925 6.57% 0.94
St Clement 10060 2 5030 36.57% 0.73
St Helier #1 10920 3 3640 -1.17% 1.01
St Helier #2 9570 3 3190 -13.39% 1.15
St Helier #3/4 16050 4 4013 8.96% 0.92
St John 3180 1 3180 -13.66% 1.16
St Lawrence 5850 2 2925 -20.58% 1.26
St Martin 4170 1 4170 13.22% 0.88
St Mary 1990 1 1990 -45.97% 1.85
St Ouen 4450 1 4450 20.83% 0.83
St Peter 5450 1 5450 47.98% 0.68
St Saviour #1 5560 2 2780 -24.52% 1.32
St Saviour #2 5300 2 2650 -28.05% 1.39
St Saviour #3 3960 1 3960 7.52% 0.93
Trinity 3430 1 3430 -6.87% 1.07
106800 29 3683

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -45.97%
  • Most under-represented: St Peter, 47.98%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 1 — 4

District Representatives Proportionally

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 2 2660 2.11% 0.98
St Brelade #1 3690 1.5 2460 -5.57% 1.06
St Brelade #2 7850 2.5 3140 20.54% 0.83
St Clement 10060 3 3354 28.75% 0.78
St Helier #1 10920 3.33 3280 25.91% 0.79
St Helier #2 9570 3.33 2874 10.33% 0.91
St Helier #3/4 16050 4.33 3707 42.30% 0.70
St John 3180 2 1590 -38.96% 1.64
St Lawrence 5850 3 1950 -25.14% 1.34
St Martin 4170 2 2085 -19.96% 1.25
St Mary 1990 2 995 -61.80% 2.62
St Ouen 4450 2 2225 -14.59% 1.17
St Peter 5450 2 2725 4.61% 0.96
St Saviour #1 5560 2.33 2387 -8.37% 1.09
St Saviour #2 5300 2.33 2275 -12.67% 1.15
St Saviour #3 3960 1.33 2978 14.32% 0.87
Trinity 3430 2 1715 -34.17% 1.52
106800 41 2605

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -61.80%
  • Most under-represented: St Helier #3/4, 42.30%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 1.33 — 4.33

District Representation

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 2 2660 2.11% 0.98
St Brelade #1 3690 2 1845 -29.17% 1.41
St Brelade #2 7850 3 2617 0.46% 1.00
St Clement 10060 3 3354 28.75% 0.78
St Helier #1 10920 4 2730 4.80% 0.95
St Helier #2 9570 4 2393 -8.14% 1.09
St Helier #3/4 16050 5 3210 23.22% 0.81
St John 3180 2 1590 -38.96% 1.64
St Lawrence 5850 3 1950 -25.14% 1.34
St Martin 4170 2 2085 -19.96% 1.25
St Mary 1990 2 995 -61.80% 2.62
St Ouen 4450 2 2225 -14.59% 1.17
St Peter 5450 2 2725 4.61% 0.96
St Saviour #1 5560 3 1854 -28.83% 1.41
St Saviour #2 5300 3 1767 -32.17% 1.47
St Saviour #3 3960 2 1980 -23.99% 1.32
Trinity 3430 2 1715 -34.17% 1.52
106800 41 2605

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -61.80%
  • Most under-represented: St Clement, 28.75%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 2 — 5

Parish Representatives

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 2 2660 2.11% 0.98
St Brelade 11540 4 2885 10.75% 0.90
St Clement 10060 3 3354 28.75% 0.78
St Helier 36540 11 3322 27.52% 0.78
St John 3180 2 1590 -38.96% 1.64
St Lawrence 5850 3 1950 -25.14% 1.34
St Martin 4170 2 2085 -19.96% 1.25
St Mary 1990 2 995 -61.80% 2.62
St Ouen 4450 2 2225 -14.59% 1.17
St Peter 5450 2 2725 4.61% 0.96
St Saviour 14820 6 2470 -5.18% 1.05
Trinity 3430 2 1715 -34.17% 1.52
106800 41 2605

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -61.80%
  • Most under-represented: St Clement, 28.75%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 2 — 11

Electoral Models:




Districts Members Range of Difference
from Average
Model D C S Deputies
Only
District
Proportionally
District
Representation
Parish
Representatives
Current Model 17 29 12 8 -46% — 48% -62% — 42% -62% — 29% -62% — 29%
P.17/2021 Amd 2 9 28 12 8 -14% — 24% -26% — 40% -6% — 19% -81% — 24%
- P.17/2021 Amd 2 Amd 9 31 12 8 -10% — 15% -28% — 32% -4% — 20% -80% — 23%
P.139/2020 9 37 12 0 -13% — 10% -22% — 32% -8% — 15% -82% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 1 9 52 0 0 -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -84% — 5%
- P.139/2020 Amd 2 14 49 0 0 -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 5 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.139/2020 Amd 6 9 37 12 0 -24% — 106% -13% — 13% -17% — 82% -70% — 6%
- P.139/2020 Amd 7 17 33 12 8 -39% — 68% -58% — 27% -58% — 15% -58% — 18%
P.7/2020 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
- P.7/2020 Amd 1 9 34 12 0 -21% — 99% -18% — 9% -13% — 79% -71% — 6%
- P.7/2020 Amd 2 9 40 12 0 -18% — 17% -23% — 20% -11% — 21% -81% — 20%
P.126/2019 9 46 0 0 -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -83% — 6%
- P.126/2019 Amd 1 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
P.133/2016 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 6 20 12 6 -15% — 22% -34% — 22% 9% — 46% -85% — 22%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.133/2016 Amd 2 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.133/2016 Amd 4 6 26 12 8 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
P.117/2013 7 28 12 7 -28% — 28% -28% — 14% -18% — 46% -85% — 11%
P.116/2013 17 29 12 6 -35% — ??? -24% — 32% -32% — 32% -24% — 32%
P.98/2013 12 49 0 0 -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25%
P.94/2013 6 34 12 0 -17% — 24% -26% — 12% -2% — 40% -86% — 6%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.94/2013 Amd 2 5 35 12 0 insufficient population data
P.93/2013 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.93/2013 Amd 2 4 32 12 0 insufficient population data
- P.93/2013 Amd 3 17 31 12 8 -42% — 58% -60% — 32% -60% — 10% -60% — 23%
P.2/2011 5 21 12 8 -7% — 11% -35% — 41% 17% — 41% -88% — 41%
- P.2/2011 Amd 1 5 21 12 8 -17% — 20% -35% — 61% 5% — 61% -88% — 61%
- P.2/2011 Amd 2 5 21 12 8 -28% — 272% -5% — 5% 3% — 192% -74% — 3%
- P.2/2011 Amd 3 17 28 12 8 -48% — 53% -63% — 39% -63% — 26% -63% — 26%
P.72/2009 6 37 12 0 -11% — 9% -21% — 29% 1% — 24% -87% — 29%
- P.72/2009 Amd 1 6 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 12 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 Amd 12 47 0 0 -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20%
- P.72/2009 Amd 3 6 35 12 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 4 6 37 0 12 no model provided
P.75/2007 6 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 1 12 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 3 6 48 0 0 no model provided
P.64/2007 12 0 12 35 n/a -78% — 311% -78% — 311% -78% — 311%
P.145/2006 Amd 1 12 37 0 12 -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19%
P.151/2004 6 47 0 0 -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -89% — 0%
P.115/2004 12 42 0 0 -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20%
P.179/2001 17 53 0 0 no model provided
Clothier 42 12 42 0 0 -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35%
Clothier 44 12 44 0 0 -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20%

*# = Duplicate electoral models

< Introduction