over.flow.je /

States of Jersey Electoral Reform Models


P.17/2021 Amd 2

Draft Constitution of the States and Public Elections (Jersey) Law 202- Amd 2
by Ian Gorst

Constitution:

> Proposition PDF

Votes:


Representation Data:




Deputies Per District

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 3 3640 -4.59% 1.05
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 4 3285 -13.89% 1.16
District 3
St Helier North
12480 3 4160 9.04% 0.92
District 4
St Saviour
14820 4 3705 -2.88% 1.03
District 5
St Clement
10060 3 3354 -12.08% 1.14
District 6
St Brelade
11540 3 3847 0.84% 0.99
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 3 3964 3.91% 0.96
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 3 4154 8.89% 0.92
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 2 4745 24.38% 0.80
106800 28 3815

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 2 : St Helier Central, -13.89%
  • Most under-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, 24.38%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 2 — 4

District Representatives Proportionally

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 3.33 3280 22.85% 0.81
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 4.33 3035 13.67% 0.88
District 3
St Helier North
12480 3.33 3748 40.37% 0.71
District 4
St Saviour
14820 5 2964 11.01% 0.90
District 5
St Clement
10060 4 2515 -5.81% 1.06
District 6
St Brelade
11540 4 2885 8.05% 0.93
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 6 1982 -25.77% 1.35
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 6 2077 -22.21% 1.29
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 4 2373 -11.12% 1.13
106800 40 2670

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 7 : St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter, -25.77%
  • Most under-represented: District 3 : St Helier North, 40.37%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 3.33 — 6

District Representation

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 4 2730 2.25% 0.98
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 5 2628 -1.57% 1.02
District 3
St Helier North
12480 4 3120 16.85% 0.86
District 4
St Saviour
14820 5 2964 11.01% 0.90
District 5
St Clement
10060 4 2515 -5.81% 1.06
District 6
St Brelade
11540 4 2885 8.05% 0.93
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 4 2973 11.35% 0.90
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 4 3115 16.67% 0.86
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 3 3164 18.50% 0.84
106800 40 2670

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 5 : St Clement, -5.81%
  • Most under-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, 18.50%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 3 — 5

Parish Representatives

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 3 1774 -33.56% 1.51
St Brelade 11540 4 2885 8.05% 0.93
St Clement 10060 4 2515 -5.81% 1.06
St Helier 36540 11 3322 24.42% 0.80
St John 3180 4 795 -70.22% 3.36
St Lawrence 5850 4 1463 -45.21% 1.83
St Martin 4170 3 1390 -47.94% 1.92
St Mary 1990 4 498 -81.35% 5.36
St Ouen 4450 4 1113 -58.31% 2.40
St Peter 5450 4 1363 -48.95% 1.96
St Saviour 14820 5 2964 11.01% 0.90
Trinity 3430 4 858 -67.87% 3.11
106800 40 2670

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -81.35%
  • Most under-represented: St Helier, 24.42%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 3 — 11

Electoral Models:




Districts Members Range of Difference
from Average
Model D C S Deputies
Only
District
Proportionally
District
Representation
Parish
Representatives
Current Model 17 29 12 8 -46% — 48% -62% — 42% -62% — 29% -62% — 29%
P.17/2021 Amd 2 9 28 12 8 -14% — 24% -26% — 40% -6% — 19% -81% — 24%
- P.17/2021 Amd 2 Amd 9 31 12 8 -10% — 15% -28% — 32% -4% — 20% -80% — 23%
P.139/2020 9 37 12 0 -13% — 10% -22% — 32% -8% — 15% -82% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 1 9 52 0 0 -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -84% — 5%
- P.139/2020 Amd 2 14 49 0 0 -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 5 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.139/2020 Amd 6 9 37 12 0 -24% — 106% -13% — 13% -17% — 82% -70% — 6%
- P.139/2020 Amd 7 17 33 12 8 -39% — 68% -58% — 27% -58% — 15% -58% — 18%
P.7/2020 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
- P.7/2020 Amd 1 9 34 12 0 -21% — 99% -18% — 9% -13% — 79% -71% — 6%
- P.7/2020 Amd 2 9 40 12 0 -18% — 17% -23% — 20% -11% — 21% -81% — 20%
P.126/2019 9 46 0 0 -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -83% — 6%
- P.126/2019 Amd 1 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
P.133/2016 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 6 20 12 6 -15% — 22% -34% — 22% 9% — 46% -85% — 22%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.133/2016 Amd 2 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.133/2016 Amd 4 6 26 12 8 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
P.117/2013 7 28 12 7 -28% — 28% -28% — 14% -18% — 46% -85% — 11%
P.116/2013 17 29 12 6 -35% — ??? -24% — 32% -32% — 32% -24% — 32%
P.98/2013 12 49 0 0 -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25%
P.94/2013 6 34 12 0 -17% — 24% -26% — 12% -2% — 40% -86% — 6%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.94/2013 Amd 2 5 35 12 0 insufficient population data
P.93/2013 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.93/2013 Amd 2 4 32 12 0 insufficient population data
- P.93/2013 Amd 3 17 31 12 8 -42% — 58% -60% — 32% -60% — 10% -60% — 23%
P.2/2011 5 21 12 8 -7% — 11% -35% — 41% 17% — 41% -88% — 41%
- P.2/2011 Amd 1 5 21 12 8 -17% — 20% -35% — 61% 5% — 61% -88% — 61%
- P.2/2011 Amd 2 5 21 12 8 -28% — 272% -5% — 5% 3% — 192% -74% — 3%
- P.2/2011 Amd 3 17 28 12 8 -48% — 53% -63% — 39% -63% — 26% -63% — 26%
P.72/2009 6 37 12 0 -11% — 9% -21% — 29% 1% — 24% -87% — 29%
- P.72/2009 Amd 1 6 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 12 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 Amd 12 47 0 0 -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20%
- P.72/2009 Amd 3 6 35 12 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 4 6 37 0 12 no model provided
P.75/2007 6 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 1 12 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 3 6 48 0 0 no model provided
P.64/2007 12 0 12 35 n/a -78% — 311% -78% — 311% -78% — 311%
P.145/2006 Amd 1 12 37 0 12 -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19%
P.151/2004 6 47 0 0 -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -89% — 0%
P.115/2004 12 42 0 0 -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20%
P.179/2001 17 53 0 0 no model provided
Clothier 42 12 42 0 0 -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35%
Clothier 44 12 44 0 0 -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20%

*# = Duplicate electoral models

< Introduction