over.flow.je /

States of Jersey Electoral Reform Models


P.7/2020 Amd 2

Reform of the Composition of the States Assembly Amd 2
by Sam M├ęzec

Constitution:

> Proposition PDF

Withdrawn


Representation Data:




Deputies Per District

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 5 2184 -18.20% 1.22
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 5 2628 -1.57% 1.02
District 3
St Helier North
12480 5 2496 -6.52% 1.07
District 4
St Saviour
14820 5 2964 11.01% 0.90
District 5
St Clement
10060 4 2515 -5.81% 1.06
District 6
St Brelade
11540 4 2885 8.05% 0.93
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 4 2973 11.35% 0.90
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 4 3115 16.67% 0.86
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 4 2373 -11.12% 1.13
106800 40 2670

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 1 : St Helier South, -18.20%
  • Most under-represented: District 8 : St John / St Lawrence / Trinity, 16.67%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 4 — 5

District Representatives Proportionally

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 5.33 2049 -0.24% 1.00
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 5.33 2466 20.06% 0.83
District 3
St Helier North
12480 5.33 2342 14.02% 0.88
District 4
St Saviour
14820 6 2470 20.25% 0.83
District 5
St Clement
10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
District 6
St Brelade
11540 5 2308 12.37% 0.89
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 7 1699 -17.28% 1.21
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 7 1780 -13.34% 1.15
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 6 1582 -22.98% 1.30
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, -22.98%
  • Most under-represented: District 4 : St Saviour, 20.25%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 7

District Representation

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 6 1820 -11.39% 1.13
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 6 2190 6.62% 0.94
District 3
St Helier North
12480 6 2080 1.27% 0.99
District 4
St Saviour
14820 6 2470 20.25% 0.83
District 5
St Clement
10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
District 6
St Brelade
11540 5 2308 12.37% 0.89
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 5 2378 15.77% 0.86
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 5 2492 21.32% 0.82
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 5 1898 -7.59% 1.08
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 1 : St Helier South, -11.39%
  • Most under-represented: District 8 : St John / St Lawrence / Trinity, 21.32%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 6

Parish Representatives

Constituency Population Ds & Cs Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 5 1064 -48.20% 1.93
St Brelade 11540 5 2308 12.37% 0.89
St Clement 10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
St Helier 36540 16 2284 11.20% 0.90
St John 3180 5 636 -69.04% 3.23
St Lawrence 5850 5 1170 -43.04% 1.76
St Martin 4170 5 834 -59.40% 2.46
St Mary 1990 5 398 -80.62% 5.16
St Ouen 4450 5 890 -56.67% 2.31
St Peter 5450 5 1090 -46.93% 1.88
St Saviour 14820 6 2470 20.25% 0.83
Trinity 3430 5 686 -66.60% 2.99
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -80.62%
  • Most under-represented: St Saviour, 20.25%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 16

Electoral Models:




Districts Members Range of Difference
from Average
Model D C S Deputies
Only
District
Proportionally
District
Representation
Parish
Representatives
Current Model 17 29 12 8 -46% — 48% -62% — 42% -62% — 29% -62% — 29%
P.17/2021 Amd 2 9 28 12 8 -14% — 24% -26% — 40% -6% — 19% -81% — 24%
- P.17/2021 Amd 2 Amd 9 31 12 8 -10% — 15% -28% — 32% -4% — 20% -80% — 23%
P.139/2020 9 37 12 0 -13% — 10% -22% — 32% -8% — 15% -82% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 1 9 52 0 0 -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -84% — 5%
- P.139/2020 Amd 2 14 49 0 0 -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 5 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.139/2020 Amd 6 9 37 12 0 -24% — 106% -13% — 13% -17% — 82% -70% — 6%
- P.139/2020 Amd 7 17 33 12 8 -39% — 68% -58% — 27% -58% — 15% -58% — 18%
P.7/2020 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
- P.7/2020 Amd 1 9 34 12 0 -21% — 99% -18% — 9% -13% — 79% -71% — 6%
- P.7/2020 Amd 2 9 40 12 0 -18% — 17% -23% — 20% -11% — 21% -81% — 20%
P.126/2019 9 46 0 0 -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -83% — 6%
- P.126/2019 Amd 1 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
P.133/2016 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 6 20 12 6 -15% — 22% -34% — 22% 9% — 46% -85% — 22%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.133/2016 Amd 2 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.133/2016 Amd 4 6 26 12 8 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
P.117/2013 7 28 12 7 -28% — 28% -28% — 14% -18% — 46% -85% — 11%
P.116/2013 17 29 12 6 -35% — ??? -24% — 32% -32% — 32% -24% — 32%
P.98/2013 12 49 0 0 -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25%
P.94/2013 6 34 12 0 -17% — 24% -26% — 12% -2% — 40% -86% — 6%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.94/2013 Amd 2 5 35 12 0 insufficient population data
P.93/2013 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.93/2013 Amd 2 4 32 12 0 insufficient population data
- P.93/2013 Amd 3 17 31 12 8 -42% — 58% -60% — 32% -60% — 10% -60% — 23%
P.2/2011 5 21 12 8 -7% — 11% -35% — 41% 17% — 41% -88% — 41%
- P.2/2011 Amd 1 5 21 12 8 -17% — 20% -35% — 61% 5% — 61% -88% — 61%
- P.2/2011 Amd 2 5 21 12 8 -28% — 272% -5% — 5% 3% — 192% -74% — 3%
- P.2/2011 Amd 3 17 28 12 8 -48% — 53% -63% — 39% -63% — 26% -63% — 26%
P.72/2009 6 37 12 0 -11% — 9% -21% — 29% 1% — 24% -87% — 29%
- P.72/2009 Amd 1 6 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 12 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 Amd 12 47 0 0 -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20%
- P.72/2009 Amd 3 6 35 12 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 4 6 37 0 12 no model provided
P.75/2007 6 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 1 12 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 3 6 48 0 0 no model provided
P.64/2007 12 0 12 35 n/a -78% — 311% -78% — 311% -78% — 311%
P.145/2006 Amd 1 12 37 0 12 -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19%
P.151/2004 6 47 0 0 -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -89% — 0%
P.115/2004 12 42 0 0 -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20%
P.179/2001 17 53 0 0 no model provided
Clothier 42 12 42 0 0 -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35%
Clothier 44 12 44 0 0 -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20%

*# = Duplicate electoral models

< Introduction