over.flow.je /

States of Jersey Electoral Reform Models


P.139/2020 Amd 1

Composition and Election of the States: Proposed Changes Amd 1
by Jeremy Ma├žon

Constitution:

> Proposition PDF

Votes:


Representation Data:




Deputies Per District

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 5 2184 6.33% 0.94
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 6 2190 6.62% 0.94
District 3
St Helier North
12480 6 2080 1.27% 0.99
District 4
St Saviour
14820 7 2118 3.12% 0.97
District 5
St Clement
10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
District 6
St Brelade
11540 6 1924 -6.33% 1.07
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 6 1982 -3.51% 1.04
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 6 2077 1.12% 0.99
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 5 1898 -7.59% 1.08
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, -7.59%
  • Most under-represented: District 2 : St Helier Central, 6.62%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 7

District Representatives Proportionally

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 5 2184 6.33% 0.94
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 6 2190 6.62% 0.94
District 3
St Helier North
12480 6 2080 1.27% 0.99
District 4
St Saviour
14820 7 2118 3.12% 0.97
District 5
St Clement
10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
District 6
St Brelade
11540 6 1924 -6.33% 1.07
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 6 1982 -3.51% 1.04
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 6 2077 1.12% 0.99
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 5 1898 -7.59% 1.08
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, -7.59%
  • Most under-represented: District 2 : St Helier Central, 6.62%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 7

District Representation

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
District 1
St Helier South
10920 5 2184 6.33% 0.94
District 2
St Helier Central
13140 6 2190 6.62% 0.94
District 3
St Helier North
12480 6 2080 1.27% 0.99
District 4
St Saviour
14820 7 2118 3.12% 0.97
District 5
St Clement
10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
District 6
St Brelade
11540 6 1924 -6.33% 1.07
District 7
St Mary / St Ouen / St Peter
11890 6 1982 -3.51% 1.04
District 8
St John / St Lawrence / Trinity
12460 6 2077 1.12% 0.99
District 9
Grouville / St Martin
9490 5 1898 -7.59% 1.08
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: District 9 : Grouville / St Martin, -7.59%
  • Most under-represented: District 2 : St Helier Central, 6.62%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 7

Parish Representatives

Constituency Population Deputies Average
Representation
Difference
from Average
Weighting
to Average
Grouville 5320 5 1064 -48.20% 1.93
St Brelade 11540 6 1924 -6.33% 1.07
St Clement 10060 5 2012 -2.04% 1.02
St Helier 36540 17 2150 4.67% 0.96
St John 3180 6 530 -74.20% 3.88
St Lawrence 5850 6 975 -52.53% 2.11
St Martin 4170 5 834 -59.40% 2.46
St Mary 1990 6 332 -83.84% 6.19
St Ouen 4450 6 742 -63.88% 2.77
St Peter 5450 6 909 -55.74% 2.26
St Saviour 14820 7 2118 3.12% 0.97
Trinity 3430 6 572 -72.15% 3.59
106800 52 2054

Range:

  • Most over-represented: St Mary, -83.84%
  • Most under-represented: St Helier, 4.67%
  • Number of representatives per citizen: 5 — 17

Electoral Models:




Districts Members Range of Difference
from Average
Model D C S Deputies
Only
District
Proportionally
District
Representation
Parish
Representatives
Current Model 17 29 12 8 -46% — 48% -62% — 42% -62% — 29% -62% — 29%
P.17/2021 Amd 2 9 28 12 8 -14% — 24% -26% — 40% -6% — 19% -81% — 24%
- P.17/2021 Amd 2 Amd 9 31 12 8 -10% — 15% -28% — 32% -4% — 20% -80% — 23%
P.139/2020 9 37 12 0 -13% — 10% -22% — 32% -8% — 15% -82% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 1 9 52 0 0 -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -8% — 7% -84% — 5%
- P.139/2020 Amd 2 14 49 0 0 -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 25% -54% — 20%
- P.139/2020 Amd 5 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.139/2020 Amd 6 9 37 12 0 -24% — 106% -13% — 13% -17% — 82% -70% — 6%
- P.139/2020 Amd 7 17 33 12 8 -39% — 68% -58% — 27% -58% — 15% -58% — 18%
P.7/2020 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
- P.7/2020 Amd 1 9 34 12 0 -21% — 99% -18% — 9% -13% — 79% -71% — 6%
- P.7/2020 Amd 2 9 40 12 0 -18% — 17% -23% — 20% -11% — 21% -81% — 20%
P.126/2019 9 46 0 0 -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -18% — 13% -83% — 6%
- P.126/2019 Amd 1 *5 9 37 12 0 -18% — 14% -27% — 39% -13% — 21% -82% — 29%
P.133/2016 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 6 20 12 6 -15% — 22% -34% — 22% 9% — 46% -85% — 22%
- P.133/2016 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.133/2016 Amd 2 *4 6 28 12 8 -20% — 41% -32% — 19% -2% — 61% -85% — 11%
- P.133/2016 Amd 4 6 26 12 8 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
P.117/2013 7 28 12 7 -28% — 28% -28% — 14% -18% — 46% -85% — 11%
P.116/2013 17 29 12 6 -35% — ??? -24% — 32% -32% — 32% -24% — 32%
P.98/2013 12 49 0 0 -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25% -27% — 25%
P.94/2013 6 34 12 0 -17% — 24% -26% — 12% -2% — 40% -86% — 6%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.94/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.94/2013 Amd 2 5 35 12 0 insufficient population data
P.93/2013 *1 6 32 12 0 -9% — 17% -29% — 16% 6% — 34% -86% — 16%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 *2 6 27 12 6 -23% — 30% -19% — 11% -5% — 43% -82% — 8%
- P.93/2013 Amd 1 Amd *3 6 26 12 6 -11% — 19% -31% — 18% 8% — 39% -86% — 18%
- P.93/2013 Amd 2 4 32 12 0 insufficient population data
- P.93/2013 Amd 3 17 31 12 8 -42% — 58% -60% — 32% -60% — 10% -60% — 23%
P.2/2011 5 21 12 8 -7% — 11% -35% — 41% 17% — 41% -88% — 41%
- P.2/2011 Amd 1 5 21 12 8 -17% — 20% -35% — 61% 5% — 61% -88% — 61%
- P.2/2011 Amd 2 5 21 12 8 -28% — 272% -5% — 5% 3% — 192% -74% — 3%
- P.2/2011 Amd 3 17 28 12 8 -48% — 53% -63% — 39% -63% — 26% -63% — 26%
P.72/2009 6 37 12 0 -11% — 9% -21% — 29% 1% — 24% -87% — 29%
- P.72/2009 Amd 1 6 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 12 49 0 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 2 Amd 12 47 0 0 -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20% -56% — 20%
- P.72/2009 Amd 3 6 35 12 0 no model provided
- P.72/2009 Amd 4 6 37 0 12 no model provided
P.75/2007 6 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 1 12 36 12 0 no model provided
- P.75/2007 Amd 3 6 48 0 0 no model provided
P.64/2007 12 0 12 35 n/a -78% — 311% -78% — 311% -78% — 311%
P.145/2006 Amd 1 12 37 0 12 -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19% -31% — 19%
P.151/2004 6 47 0 0 -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -7% — 4% -89% — 0%
P.115/2004 12 42 0 0 -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20% -61% — 20%
P.179/2001 17 53 0 0 no model provided
Clothier 42 12 42 0 0 -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35% -22% — 35%
Clothier 44 12 44 0 0 -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20% -35% — 20%

*# = Duplicate electoral models

< Introduction